<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OpenGovBlog.org - Practical Ideas to enable more Effective and Open Government &#187; authentication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opengovblog.org/tag/authentication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opengovblog.org</link>
	<description>Practical Ideas to enable more Effective and Open Government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:09:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Gov 2.o Spoofing is here. Reciprocal Link Authentication could prevent misunderstanding.</title>
		<link>http://www.opengovblog.org/2009/06/gov-2-o-spoofing-is-here-reciprocal-link-authentication-could-prevent-misunderstanding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opengovblog.org/2009/06/gov-2-o-spoofing-is-here-reciprocal-link-authentication-could-prevent-misunderstanding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authentication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governement 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web20blog.org/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Postscript:  Another example of government spoofing was a prank cell phone call from India to the Pakistani Defense Minstry the day after the Mumbai terrorist attack.  The called claimed to be an Indian Defense Ministry Official and was claiming that India was going to retaliate. Planes went up in the air on both sides and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opengovblog.org/2009/06/gov-2-o-spoofing-is-here-reciprocal-link-authentication-could-prevent-misunderstanding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Authenticity:  Should Feds carry a badge in cyberspace? Or at least a reciprocol link?</title>
		<link>http://www.opengovblog.org/2009/05/online-authenticity-should-feds-carry-a-badge-in-cyberspace-or-at-least-a-reciprocol-link/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opengovblog.org/2009/05/online-authenticity-should-feds-carry-a-badge-in-cyberspace-or-at-least-a-reciprocol-link/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Fischer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authentication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web20blog.org/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The future of the internet will involve more authentication than it does today but here is a potential interim solution to provide some level of authentication for Gov 2.0 presence on online social networks such as facebook and twitter. standard policy of having a reciprocal link back to a facebook fan page or twitter account [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opengovblog.org/2009/05/online-authenticity-should-feds-carry-a-badge-in-cyberspace-or-at-least-a-reciprocol-link/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

