<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OpenGovBlog.org - Practical Ideas to enable more Effective and Open Government &#187; Building Better Government Websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opengovblog.org/category/building-better-government-websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opengovblog.org</link>
	<description>Practical Ideas to enable more Effective and Open Government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:09:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why does .Gov still require www.?  Open Government is a User Friendly Government</title>
		<link>http://www.opengovblog.org/2010/01/why-does-gov-still-require-www-open-government-is-a-user-friendly-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opengovblog.org/2010/01/why-does-gov-still-require-www-open-government-is-a-user-friendly-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Building Better Government Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.Gov websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opengovblog.org/?p=525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just typed in yet another .gov address to come with &#8220;page not found.&#8221;  Why? Because I am efficient and think the internet should be too. I don&#8217;t type in www in front of domains anymore by default.  Most commercial webmasters and ISP providers have figured this out. For some reason a lot of federal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opengovblog.org/2010/01/why-does-gov-still-require-www-open-government-is-a-user-friendly-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Government Innovation: Better Citizen Outreach and PSAs through a .Gov Ad Exchange</title>
		<link>http://www.opengovblog.org/2010/01/open-government-innovation-better-citizen-outreach-and-psas-through-a-gov-ad-exchange/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opengovblog.org/2010/01/open-government-innovation-better-citizen-outreach-and-psas-through-a-gov-ad-exchange/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Building Better Government Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outreach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Service Announcment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banner ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen outreach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lower costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural digital resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opengovblog.org/?p=497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A central problem and budget issue for the federal government is how much to spend on public service advertisement campaigns (PSAs)?  How much is viewership worth?  This bears very much on the effectiveness of government outreach which will be more and more important for as a more open government explores ways to acheive [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opengovblog.org/2010/01/open-government-innovation-better-citizen-outreach-and-psas-through-a-gov-ad-exchange/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 200 .Gov Websites: Thinking about Metrics and Performance Management for Open Government</title>
		<link>http://www.opengovblog.org/2009/12/top-200-gov-websites-thinking-about-metrics-and-performance-management-for-open-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opengovblog.org/2009/12/top-200-gov-websites-thinking-about-metrics-and-performance-management-for-open-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Building Better Government Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opengovblog.org/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top Government Websites by Visitors:

Top FederalWebsite:  ED.gov 
Top State Website:  CA.gov
Top City Website:  NYC.gov

On the eve of the open government directive, I wanted to start thinking about to measure how well an agency does Open Government.  Afterall we are not working on Open Government to say we are doing it, but to serve the mission [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opengovblog.org/2009/12/top-200-gov-websites-thinking-about-metrics-and-performance-management-for-open-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

